Friday, June 12, 2026

Heritage Foundation presents Marxism v. Conservatism


Dr. Paul Kengor at the Heritage Foundation, June 4, 2026/By Patricia Leslie



The program was billed as "Communism at America 250," the third annual Lee Edwards Lecture in Conservative Leadership at the Heritage Foundation.

Dr. Paul Kengor spoke on the principles of Marxism versus Conservatism.

He rarely used the word "communism" other than to say (a couple of times) that communists do not permit elections.

Dr. Lee Edwards's daughter, Dr. Elizabeth Edwards Spalding, the chairman of the Victims of Communism Memorial Foundation, served as moderator.  

Dr. Paul Kengor and Dr. Elizabeth Edwards Spalding at the Heritage Foundation, June 4, 2026/By Patricia Leslie


Dr. Kengor is the author of 20 books, including The Devil and Karl Marx, and teaches separate classes on Marxism and Conservatism at Grove City College, both, quite popular classes, it seemed from his remarks.

He began his talk with Gallup statistics which says that 67% of American college students have a positive or neutral attitude towards socialism while only 40% have a positive view of capitalism. 

Dr. Paul Kengor at the Heritage Foundation, June 4, 2026/By Patricia Leslie

No two philosophies present a clearer contrast than Marxism and Conservatism, he said, describing Marxism in one sentence: “the abolition of private property” requiring “gulags and guns to take away."


He presented a 10-point plan of Marxism, and said, with the assistance of a student, he had conducted a content analysis of the Communist Manifesto. 
1998  was the 150th anniversary of its publication.

In their study, they never found the word "love," but they found the most popular word to be "abolition" as in, Marxism seeks to take away inheritances and spread population so that people are equally distributed between town and country. 

Marxism requires a forcible withdrawal of all existing social conditions to achieve its goals, including the necessity of separating children from parents.

“Communism begins where atheism begins“ and "it's hard to be a conservative if you are an atheist."


He featured Ronald Reagan and the principles of conservatism which is the opposite of progressivism. 

While conservatives believe in an enduring moral order, progressives believe in an evolving moral order.  The principles of conservatism are unchanging.

Reagan believed that “every person is a sacred reality and the individual is superior to the state.”

Republicans are grounded by moral laws.

Reagan was pictured on the big screen with some of his famous quotes, followed by photos and quotes of Russell Kirk, Edmund Burke, and G.K. Chesterton.

In the question and answer session, Dr. Spalding said conservative curriculum has been developed for elementary through college level students.

That's where the Heritage Foundation comes in, according to Kengor, because it comes down to "education and education and education." 

The first time Trump’s name came up was when Kengor talked about the likeability of Ronald Reagan and how happy he was. Reagan was not an angry man; he was not hated by the majority and he 
carried 49 of 50 states in 1984.

Trump’s name came up again when Kengor quoted Reagan‘s “peace through strength“ which he said Trump uses a lot.

Surprisingly, the speaker devoted quite a bit of time to Pope Leo XIV whom he called a Republican but, when it comes to peace and the pope's opposition to war, well, maybe he's a liberal in that aspect, after all.  

He said 108 of the 133 electors voted for Pope Leo (a confidential number, he said). The Catholics wanted a return to normalcy, while the Italians favored Leo because he was “the least American of Americans.”

Dr. Paul Kengor at the Heritage Foundation, June 4, 2026/By Patricia Leslie


Dr. Spalding invited all present to a candlelight vigil and the third sponsored anniversary of the Tiananmen Square Massacre at Massachusetts and New Jersey avenues at 8 p.m. that night (June 4).

A reception with beer, wine, and hors d’oeuvres followed the presentation. Security was tight.

From its press release: "The Heritage Foundation established the annual Lee Edwards Lecture in recognition of Dr. Edwards’s long service as a Distinguished Fellow in Conservative Thought at The Heritage Foundation, during which he wrote most of his 25 books about the leading individuals and institutions of the modern conservative movement. In addition to biographies of President Ronald Reagan, Barry Goldwater, William F. Buckley Jr. and Edwin Meese III, Dr. Edwards wrote histories of The Heritage Foundation, the Intercollegiate Studies Institute, and the conservative movement."


patricialesli@gmail.com

Sunday, May 31, 2026

Recommended (with reservations): 'Surreal: The Extraordinary Life of Gala Dali'



Oh, the places they went! The people they saw! The people they knew! The oohs and the ahs!

Readers:  You may think you've known a wild life but I doubt you’ve experienced anything like the lives of Gala (1894-1982) and Salvador Dali (1904-1989).  If so, you must be in an unusual contest. 

What fun is was to read about the young in Paris during Dada!


Except for all the many confusing names and sometimes helter-skelter mixed-up paragraphs and subjects which jump all over the place and the need for better (or some) editing, this is a good read by Michele Gerber Klein for art enthusiasts.  


Gala's nickname was bestowed on her by her first husband, Paul Éluard, whom she met at a sanatorium in Switzerland when they both were 17 and she was being treated for tuberculosis.

They married in 1917 and their only child, a daughter, Cecile was born in 1918 (d. 2016); Gala was never a good mother and did not like the role. 

Her relationship with Dali began while she was still married to Paul (1917-1929), but she remained close to Paul for the rest of his life (1895-1952), he providing her with financial advice. 

Paul became a renowned poet and was one of the founders of Surrealism.

Meanwhile, Dali was ten years younger than Gala and a virgin (at age 25).  His father disinherited him because Gala was born a Russian and married.  Father and son did not speak for five years. 

Salvador Dali credited Gala with most parts of his artistic life, his life support, he called her whose name he signed to his paintings, she, the subject of many.

She was much more than his business manager:  She edited and skillfully marketed his works, monetizing every product she (and they) could conceive, much like Trump markets his name today on many and various things. 

Gala taught Dali how to dress, take the stairs (!), how to eat without throwing chicken bones to the ceiling, how to recognize enemies and how to stop losing money. 

The Dalis traveled all over Europe and the U.S., visiting in the homes of friends, often during the late 1930s as Hitler began his invasion of Austria.

Their bizarre lifestyles made them Paris‘s hot couple and when they came to the U.S. for the first time in 1934, “the cameras went wild” (p. 123). After all, Gala wore two lamb chops on her shoulder which were tied to Dali's coat.

They socialized with the very rich, but they struggled financially, a condition Gala tried to hide. 

The designer, Chanel, with whom they remained lifelong friends, recognized a good model when she saw one and loaned Gala clothes to wear and to market.  (The trio is pictured on p. 61 in this month's copy of Elle.) 

It was not surprising to read that Dali “always made work in order to disturb as many people as possible" (p. 120) and he and Gala delighted in novelty.

 Some have called them, the inventors of performance art.

Despite their open marriage especially in later years, they maintained a strong relationship and Dali had her remains interred in a Spanish castle he bought for her 14 years before her death, he outliving her by seven years. 

If you can wade through all the names or just ignore many of them and the confusing editing, you'll get through this like I did.  

It seems like another good movie in the make!  A book sure to open eyes and wonder about what all you've missed. 

patricialesli@gmail.com 

Sunday, May 24, 2026

Film review: 'Andre is an Idiot' and so was I

The movie poster reminds me of art by Salvador Dali

To think this was a comedy!

Well, kinda sorta if you can take the ride to death with André Ricciardi as he makes light of his colon cancer discovered at Stage 4, several years before he succumbed. 

André Is an Idiot opened at the Sundance Film Festival in January, 2025 when the film received several awards and strong reviews, says WikipediaSince then, the film, directed and produced by Tony Benna, has received more awards and nominations.

Rotten Tomatoes' critics gave it a 97, my reason for going.

André is a lot darker than I anticipated, watching the comedy gradually die with André who failed to get a colonoscopy in time. 

Stupid!  Said his mother and a whole lot more.


André is a very funny, funny guy, but it’s painful to see his physical state decline after so many months. His mental state never withers (except for a saddened emotional state, natch) but there goes the comedy with his death. 

André, his brother, André's wife Janice, hiclose friend Lee Einhorn (who's also the executive producer), and more are interviewed extensively, along with André's daughters.

The film also presents an example of a happy, long-term marriage that was happenstance!  

Imagine.  It happens.

A shortened version of André, say 15 to 20 minutes or so, would be valuable for all those community centers with senior programs.  

But getting a colonoscopy should happen well before you become a senior citizen, like at age 45 to start. 

Message:  Get one.

Location: San Francisco 

patricialesli@gmail.com



Wednesday, May 20, 2026

'Michael' and 'Elvis,' the films



EPIC: Elvis Presley in Concert (2025)


I liked EPIC Elvis (in concert) better because it was authentic, a documentary with lots of actual film of the king performing, talking, and background scenes, while the story of Michael is acted, fairly much a hagiography endorsed by the Jackson family. (Michael's son, Prince Jackson, was the executive producer and on set a lot.)

As with books, I prefer non-fiction.

Peopl
Juliano Valdi is young Michael and Larenz Tate is Berry Gordy in Michael/photo by Glen Wilson/Lionsgate

Jaafar Jackson, Michael's nephew and the son of Jermaine Jackson, one of the Jackson 5, is the star who does sing the songs which was surprising to me, expecting lip syncing, but some of the numbers are his voice on Michael's tracks, according to his remarks on the Today show April 2, 2026.

Nevertheless, he and Juliano Vardi as the young Michael did incredible jobs, but they were not "Michael." Elvis was "Elvis."  (See my review of EPIC Elvis at the link above.) 

Jaafar Jackson is Michael Jackson in Michael/photo by Glen Wilson/Lionsgate

Whereas Elvis has many more of his top hits included in the film, almost all of Michael's are shortened and it's not until near the end of Michael that we get even close to a full version of one of his songs.

Colman Domingo is Joe Jackson, the father, in Michael/photo by Glen Wilson/Lionsgate
 

Colman Domingo is Joe Jackson, the father, and every bit as despicable as rumors have him to be, but spectacular here whom I hope will be nominated for an Oscar. 


Nia Long is Michael’s mother, rather weak and maybe she was in real life.  


The negative parts of Michael's life are generally ignored with the film ending abruptly, lamely with “to be continued." I'll say.


Save your IMAX money for something better than Michael since an IMAX screen is not as vital as it was for Elvis, but who's to know on the front end?  I am here to tell you. 


I'm glad I took the advice advertised at Cinema Arts Fairfax to see Elvis on IMAX.  What a difference it made!  


I tried to see it again on IMAX the following weekend, but alas, could find no area theatres screening it. 


Later, I rushed to see Michael at the same IMAX (Tysons, VA) where most of the seats were sold on the first Saturday afternoon after its release, but IMAX for Michael was not necessary and besides, it set me back $33+!  Even with my senior rate and a 15 % discount for an afternoon show, admission was $19.99. Add a small popcorn and drink for a grand total of $33.  Yikers!


Take me to the bank.


patricialesli@gmail.com







Tuesday, April 28, 2026

Highly recommended, the book and audio: 'Tanqueray'

 


This is a great audio to listen to (read by the author) and the book has fascinating photos to see, both editions, available at libraries. 

 

 

In 2019 a blogger, Brandon Stanton whose series, Humans of New York was followed by millions, was attracted to an unusually dressed woman in fancy gear

along the streets of Chelsea in New York City. 


Mr. Stanton stopped for a chat which led to a friendship which led to a column in his series, which led to the book Tanqueray, the expose of Stephanie Johnson’s life and one of her last life's chapters before a stroke felled her last October at age 81. 


Her obituary led me to the audio and book.

 

Ms. Johnson was a famous burlesque dancer in the Big Apple in the 1960s and 70s, and she lays it all out straight, everything, rather like a rip-roaring escapade of edgy New York life, kinda gangster style, a strip club and more (a life most of us only hear or read about and maybe, wish we’d experienced a trifle of it?).

 

She was a self-made woman whose mother threw her out when Ms. Johnson was 17 and pregnant.  On her own, she made her way from Albany, N.Y.  to New York where she built her reputation.

 

Her name “Tanqueray” came from a bottle of gin sitting near a conversation. 


Mr. Stanton helped her write her bio in which she speaks in highly entertaining fashion (of which she was an excellent seamstress, attending classes at the Fashion Institute of Technology, making sparkly costumes for herself and many others).  


She had lots of boyfriends, was married twice and prided herself on not sleeping around or drinking.  She had two sons and gave up her daughter for adoption. The book Mr. Stanton wrote of their many conversations drew millions of readers and helped restore her relationship with an estranged son.


She was lonely, very, very lonely.

 

When serious illness struck, Mr. Stanton spearheaded a GoFundMe campaign for Ms. Johnson which produced about $2.6 million for her medical needs and solved her money worries. Leftover money went to the Association to Benefit Children.  

 

Ms. Johnson and Mr. Stanton speak in the postscript, not to miss!

 

It’s a short 192 pages, hard to put down; a (very) fast read and wow!  I want to see this movie.


patricialesli@gmail.com



Wednesday, April 22, 2026

Sad lives, sad book, the Dionne Quints


Ontario Premier Mitchell Hepburn with the Dionne Quintuplets when they were about six months old/unknown photographer, Wikipedia


I ran across The Dionne Years: A Thirties Melodrama  (1977) in an obituary of the last of the Dionne quintuplets, Annette, who died Dec. 24, 2025 at age 91.

Pierre Berton (1920-2004), the author of The Dionne Years, interviewed some 50 persons for this book, many with direct knowledge or relationships with the Dionne quints.  He furnishes notes but no bibliography. He wrote about 50 other books, plus many more for juveniles.

It’s a fast read. 

On May 28, 1934 in a small village in Ontario, midwives delivered the first of the quints followed by Dr. Allan Roy Dafoe who delivered the last ones. 

After their births, a reporter called the doctor about every 20 minutes inquiring about the babies' health, but since no other quintuplets had lived longer than a few days, the doctor had little hope for their survival.

The house had no electricity, and the babies were kept warm near the oven. They were fed with an eye dropper every two hours and attended by three nurses, one who was always on duty.


Their total weight was 13 pounds, six ounces with the largest weighing 2.5 pounds and the smallest, Marie, 1.5 pounds. 

None were longer than nine inches.

When Dr. Dafoe permitted a member of the press to see the infants wrapped in blankets, their father, Mr. Dionne, when he arrived home, threw the person out. Mr. Dionne had a reputation for using a pitchfork when it came to curiosity seekers. 

Another time, after a reporter took the babies outside for some sunshine, a nurse exploded in a verbal tirade when she discovered them.

That the babies were born midway through the Great Depression (1929-1939) provided an pleasant escape for everyone (or, perhaps for those curiosity seekers, rather like our astronauts today).

Mothers donated breast milk. Various vendors supplied their baby and medical needs. 

With five older children, the Dionnes were hard up for money, and their father and Dr. Dafoe agreed with promoters to permit the babies to go on display at a Chicago event which their mother later rejected.

The Canadian government used this incident as proof that the quints needed protection for their well-being and passed a law seizing them from their family.

When the parents were criticized for trying to make money off their children, it was Dr. Dafoe and the Canadian government who profited. 

The public treated Dr. Dafoe like royalty.  In 1943 alone, the good doctor Dafoe pocketed $182,466 (equivalent to $3,328,991 in 2025).

 For several years, the quints were the number one tourist attraction in Canada, surpassing Niagara Falls and equal to attendance at Mt. Vernon and Gettysburg in the U.S.

Retailers paid thousands of dollars to have their products pictured with the quints.

To enable the many people who came to see them, a play area was constructed on the Dionnes' property ("Quintland,") where visitors could watch the children play through a one-way screen , but the children could hear the visitors and the screens were not totally opaque.

Curiosity seekers were admitted 100 at a time to watch or about 3,000 a day.

For several years the girls lived in a nursery built for them with round-the-clock care like at a hospital, under the strict supervision and care of Dr. Dafoe and specialized nurses, the doctor who grew to love the children, as did the nursing staff.

Dr. Dafoe kept them under a strict regimen and to meet public expectations, had them dressed alike until they were five years old.

On pages 125-126, the book says a March 1936 article in Cosmopolitan by the renowned Dr. Alfred Adler (one of the triumvirate with Freud and Jung) likened their hospital residency to "inmates of a model orphanage and a certain emotional starvation,” and in later life, the sisters recounted their growing-up years in much the same way, urging parents not to treat their children as showpieces as they had been raised.

Acting as their father, Dr. Dafoe prohibited much contact between the children and their parents who were treated in the press and elsewhere as if they were dumb, blind, and ignorant.

The parents did not attend the quints' first birthday extravaganza when press services, all three US radio networks and more were invited. Said their father: “We don’t consider it an honor to be invited by pure strangers to visit our own children.” (p.108)

Some of the celebrities who came to see them included Bette Davis, W. K. Kellogg, and Amelia Earhart and her husband five weeks before Ms. Earhart disappeared in the Pacific Ocean. (Most source say six weeks before she disappeared.)

The Quints grew up, some got married, joined a convent, starred in three films, divorced, and in later years, realized little to nothing from their famous births.

 

patricialesli@gmail.com   






Thursday, April 2, 2026

No White House Ballroom!

Citizens protest the Trump ballroom at a meeting of the National Capital Planning Commission, Washington, D.C., April 2, 2026/By Patricia Leslie
Citizens protest the Trump ballroom at a meeting of the National Capital Planning Commission, Washington, D.C., April 2, 2026/By Patricia Leslie
Citizens protest the Trump ballroom at a meeting of the National Capital Planning Commission, Washington, D.C., April 2, 2026/By Patricia Leslie
Citizens protest the Trump ballroom at a meeting of the National Capital Planning Commission, Washington, D.C., April 2, 2026/By Patricia Leslie
Citizens protest the Trump ballroom at a meeting of the National Capital Planning Commission, Washington, D.C., April 2, 2026/By Patricia Leslie
Citizens protest the Trump ballroom at a meeting of the National Capital Planning Commission, Washington, D.C., April 2, 2026/By Patricia Leslie
Citizens protest the Trump ballroom at a meeting of the National Capital Planning Commission, Washington, D.C., April 2, 2026/By Patricia Leslie
Jon Golinger of Public Citizen shows letters received in opposition to the Trump ballroom while citizens protest the ballroom at a meeting of the National Capital Planning Commission, Washington, D.C., April 2, 2026,/By Patricia Leslie
Jon Golinger of Public Citizens shows boxes of copies of 35,000 messages, of which 97% opposed Trump's ballroom, at the citizens protest today in Washington, D.C., April 2, 2026 /By Patricia Leslie
Citizens protest the Trump ballroom at a meeting of the National Capital Planning Commission, Washington, D.C., April 2, 2026/By Patricia Leslie